Teams

Seminole Lake Jordan

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-10vs RCSP FaraciWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Monika Hazners6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-03vs Countryside CoyotesWon 20
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Betsy Rutkowski6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Bozarth / Ingrid Silva vs Elizabeth Tafone / Michele Weinstock6-2, 6-2
2023-05-13vs SPTC PruettWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Christine Assefa6-2, 6-2
2023-05-06vs Tarpon ColemanWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Paula Kastenson6-2, 6-0
2023-04-29vs ELW HueholtWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Svetlana Bondareva6-3, 6-0
2023-04-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesSonia Agee / Beverly Bozarth vs Bettie Romer / Debbie Walker6-1, 6-1
2023-04-01vs SPTC PruettSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Jamie Connelly6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Walker / Beverly Bozarth vs Amy Ladden / Lisa Jacome3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Moise Carrington
published 3.5
3.02
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
2.99
Valeska Dykes
published
2.93
Erica Allums
published
2.89
Karen Morris
published
2.81
Debra Edwards
published 3
2.80
Asheley Wardell
published 3
2.65
Beverly Bozarth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Patty Anderson
published
2.50
Sonia Agee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Bozarth + Debra Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–71L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 8 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Valeska Dykes
20W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
Erica Allums
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Karen Morris
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Debra Edwards
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Asheley Wardell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Beverly Bozarth
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Patty Anderson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Sonia Agee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.