Teams

Just for Fun

2025 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-08vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Choi / Hanlun Song vs John Choi / Jaeil Ahn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-07vs Smiles and Laughs 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Louis Fung vs Chungfu Yang / Eric Zhou6-3, 6-4
2025-02-28vs Blazing Dodgers 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHanlun Song / Peter Zhu vs Frederic Colas / Chris Takiar3-6, 4-6
2025-02-21vs Young IntrepidsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKameron Hnath / Hanlun Song vs Gerald McClellan / Gregory Whitmyer2-6, 3-6
2025-02-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Ryan Choi vs John Lee / Scott Miller6-2, 6-1
2025-01-28vs Smiles and Laughs 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Jun Hee Kim vs Shubo Zhang / James Wen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-15vs Young IntrepidsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Choi / Mark Tyler vs Igor Chechik / Taft Irons6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKameron Hnath / Jun Hee Kim vs Todd Johnson / Michael Berman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDave Kim / Eddie Gao vs Harvey Kellman / Ivan Teelucksingh3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-08vs Sultans of SwingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Hanlun Song vs Raza Shah / Jaeil Ahn2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Hanlun Song
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.73
Matthew Bent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Peter Zhu
published
3.50
Louis Fung
published
3.38
Jun Hee Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chung-Kai Hsiao
published 3.5
3.18
Kameron Hnath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Mark Tyler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Wei Fu
published
2.94
Woo Jin Shim
published
2.87
Bo Liang
published 3
2.78
Eddie Gao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ping-Jung Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Gao + Bo Liang224 matchesnot enough data
Louis Fung + Mark Tyler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hanlun Song
159W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Matthew Bent
58W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Louis Fung
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jun Hee Kim
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Chung-Kai Hsiao
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kameron Hnath
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Wei Fu
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Woo Jin Shim
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Eddie Gao
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.