Teams

Henry - Norbeck Blue Belles

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-12vs Franklin - BCC 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hooker / Christine Nowack vs Amanda Franklin / Ivey Castleberry6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Solomon / Amy Weichel vs Cariza McCarthy / Astrid Ruggeri6-1, 6-2
2024-12-06vs IaleggioLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Nowack / Amy Weichel vs Karen Leder / Mari Collins1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-20vs Marcotte - Fall Maryland MadnessWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristine Nowack / Nancy Hull vs Linda Donaldson / Kristi Nault6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJackie Solomon / Celeste Henry vs Anhvinh Wright / Allison Meringoff6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-12vs Donellan-Manor 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesCeleste Henry / Christine Nowack vs Kelley Donellan / Melisssa Hacopian6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Hull / Jackie Solomon vs Melissa Valencia / Maureen Smith4-6, 4-2, 1-0
2024-11-05vs Smith-Poaching PairsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Solomon / Jennifer Vu vs Heather FREIDKIN / Denise Levis5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-30vs Korolkoff - Chicks With SticksLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Phillips / Christine Nowack vs Jody Amann / Desiree Nichtula6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
KATIE KELLY
published
3.46
Christine Nowack
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Celeste Henry
published 3.5
3.42
Christine Willey
published 3.5
3.39
Amy Weichel
published 3.5
3.37
Jennifer Vu
published
3.30
Jackie Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephanie Hooker
published
3.25
Nancy Hull
published
3.20
Linda Ginsburg
published
Freddi Weiner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Solomon + Christine Nowack4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KATIE KELLY
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Christine Nowack
45W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Celeste Henry
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Christine Willey
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Amy Weichel
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jennifer Vu
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Jackie Solomon
49W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Stephanie Hooker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Nancy Hull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Linda Ginsburg
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Freddi Weiner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.