Teams

Serves You Right

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 4.0 18s

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-26vs Over Served 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Smithee / Mark Weber vs Scott Weiss / Sudhir Gopal2-6, 2-6
2022-06-19vs High-StrungLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Weber / Ken Madsen vs Jason Coppi / Mitch Pruett4-6, 4-6
2022-06-12vs CrushersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Smithee / Mark Weber vs Anand Rajagopal / Sagar Suchak6-4, 7-6
2022-06-11vs CrushersWon 10
W#3 DoublesPhil Harrison / Mark Weber vs Lawrence Rountree / Luigi Villani4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesMark Weber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs Wilco warriors 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Weber / Jean-Marie Delbar vs Rory Reeve / Christopher Bruerton1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Bryen Woo
published 4.5
3.84
Cole Weber
published 4
3.76
Hassan Ali
published 4
3.73
Chris Reese
published 4
3.72
Tim Maranto
published
3.66
Donghua Cao
published 4
3.60
James Wahrer
published 4
3.54
Gary Smithee
published 4
3.48
Tom Thornton
published
3.44
Mark Weber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Phil Harrison
published
Jean-Marie Delbar
published
Jimmy Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hassan Ali + Mark Weber3841% games−0.3% vs expected
Mark Weber + Tom Thornton01134% games−4.8% vs expected
Gary Smithee + Mark Weber1529% gamesnot enough data
Mark Weber + Phil Harrison1546% gamesnot enough data
Jean-Marie Delbar + Mark Weber044 matchesnot enough data
Tim Maranto + Tom Thornton033 matchesnot enough data
Jean-Marie Delbar + Tom Thornton123 matchesnot enough data
Gary Smithee + Hassan Ali213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bryen Woo
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Cole Weber
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Hassan Ali
27W–42L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chris Reese
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Tim Maranto
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Donghua Cao
25W–47L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
James Wahrer
2W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Gary Smithee
33W–45L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Tom Thornton
63W–59L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Mark Weber
37W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
Phil Harrison
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Jean-Marie Delbar
27W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jimmy Jackson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.