Teams

SCC - Bernstein

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-11vs BP - MillioneWon 30
W#2 DoublesDavid Cutlip / Kirk McElveen vs Kai Hovland / Emmanuel Zamudio6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTravis Swain vs Andre Kavakama6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFred Harold / Erik Bernstein vs Edward Silverstein / Nicholas Weber7-5, 6-2
2025-11-04vs RH - DittmerWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Cutlip / Travis Swain vs Garr Parks / Michael Burns5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Gloistein / Kirk McElveen vs Mike Kecken / Richard Ralls6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesWilliam Diehl vs James Posovich6-0, 6-1
2025-10-21vs BP - OwenWon 30
W#1 DoublesErik Bernstein / William Diehl vs Justin Owen / Martin Gendelman6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeau Hinton vs Fabio Gobette Lopes6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Cutlip / Travis Swain vs Gregg Johnson / Jim Ryan6-2, 6-0
2025-10-14vs CRC - BryantWon 40
W#1 DoublesErik Bernstein / William Diehl vs Todd Jackson / Bryan Risch6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBeau Hinton vs Paul Bannister6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesTravis Swain vs Matthew Anderson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFred Harold / Scott Anderson vs Jan Nielsen / Evan Sell6-3, 6-3
2025-10-07vs BP - MillioneWon 21
L#2 DoublesKirk McElveen / Fred Harold vs Andre Kavakama / Kai Hovland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBeau Hinton vs Paul Garnett6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErik Bernstein / William Diehl vs Nicholas Weber / Mike Miller6-0, 6-2
2025-09-30Won 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Cutlip / Travis Swain vs Lafayette Burks / Michael Burns7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBeau Hinton vs Ali Shojaee Bakhtiari6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Johnson / William Diehl vs Richard Ralls / Barry Lee7-5, 6-0
2025-09-16vs BP - OwenLost 12
L#2 DoublesJohn Gloistein / Travis Swain vs Jim Ryan / Isaac Stewart4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesWilliam Diehl vs Fabio Gobette Lopes4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirk McElveen / Andrew Johnson vs Trey Iorillo / Johnny Yang5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-09vs CRC - BryantWon 30
W#1 SinglesTravis Swain vs Zac Heywood6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesWilliam Diehl vs Evan Sell6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKirk McElveen / Andrew Johnson vs Scott Idleman / Jan Nielsen6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
William Diehl
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.47
Beau Hinton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Travis Swain
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.30
Steven Carbone
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.98
David Cutlip
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Erik Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.89
Patrick Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.88
Fred Harold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Kirk McElveen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Andrew Johnson
published 3
2.73
John Gloistein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Schwarz
published
Theron Leet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Cutlip + John Gloistein4149% games+7.1% vs expected
David Cutlip + Kirk McElveen224 matchesnot enough data
David Cutlip + Travis Swain224 matchesnot enough data
Kirk McElveen + Andrew Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
John Gloistein + Patrick Buchanan224 matchesnot enough data
Steven Carbone + John Gloistein303 matchesnot enough data
Erik Bernstein + William Diehl303 matchesnot enough data
Erik Bernstein + Andrew Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Diehl
20W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Beau Hinton
14W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Travis Swain
18W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Steven Carbone
32W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.30
3
David Cutlip
21W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Erik Bernstein
21W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Patrick Buchanan
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Fred Harold
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Kirk McElveen
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Andrew Johnson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
John Gloistein
19W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Michael Schwarz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Theron Leet
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.