Teams

DCarmazzi (Matthews Tennis Club)

2023 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-22vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJanet Baker / Debbie Carmazzi vs Julie Benton / Ann Lacarter6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Wandler / Martha Wells vs Lina Mazigi / Sandra Stowe6-1, 6-4
2023-04-19vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Wandler / Martha Wells vs Sandra Stowe / Mildred Deely6-3, 6-1
2023-03-31vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosemary Hill / Martha Wells vs Nancy Dunn / Ann Lacarter6-2, 6-3
2023-03-24vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Marsha McCrory vs Julie Benton / Katherine Hargett7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRosemary Hill / Martha Wells vs Nancy Dunn / Ann Lacarter7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-17vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Debbie Carmazzi vs Nancy Dunn / Donna Buchman6-2, 6-2
2023-03-09vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRosemary Hill / Martha Wells vs Sandra Stowe / Lina Mazigi6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Janet Baker vs Mildred Deely / Nancy Dunn6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Marty Corley
published
3.86
Dee Wilson
published 4
3.84
Carol Almond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Sharon Greene
published
3.81
Debbie Carmazzi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Janet Baker
published
3.70
Nicole Morris
published
3.68
Saundra Denny
published
3.56
Martha Wells
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Rosemary Hill
published
Korrie Berens
published
Lindsey Linker
published
Susan Battle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marty Corley
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Dee Wilson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
Sharon Greene
21W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Debbie Carmazzi
67W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Janet Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Nicole Morris
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Saundra Denny
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Martha Wells
99W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rosemary Hill
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Korrie Berens
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Linker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Battle
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.