Teams

PCTC-Staples/Harris

2022 SCTA Winter '21 · '22 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '22 - USTA Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.79
Debbi Seelye
published 4
3.75
Cassi Weissflog
published 4
3.74
Jo-Ann Jones
published
3.68
Shannon Rose
published
3.50
Jennifer Trevena
published
3.44
Monica Simpson
published
3.40
Vickie Ware
published
3.38
Elizabeth Yarbrough
published 3.5
3.38
Wendy Applegate
published
3.38
Meredith Wall
published
3.32
Mercy Forsyth
published
Amanda Harris
published 3.5
3.12
Cyndi Harkins
published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Staples
published
3.10
Amy Lombardo
published 3.5
Janet Depooter
published
Kathleen Justice
published
Tracy Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo-Ann Jones + Tracy Ross7260% games+10.5% vs expected
Jennifer Trevena + Debbi Seelye13854% games−2.0% vs expected
Cassi Weissflog + Jennifer Kapala Oldham6257% games−2.2% vs expected
Vickie Ware + Elizabeth Yarbrough5073% gamesnot enough data
Cyndi Harkins + Elizabeth Yarbrough314 matchesnot enough data
Jo-Ann Jones + Shannon Rose314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Harris + Janet Depooter224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Trevena + Jennifer Kapala Oldham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kapala Oldham
50W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Debbi Seelye
36W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cassi Weissflog
37W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Jo-Ann Jones
30W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Shannon Rose
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Jennifer Trevena
33W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
Monica Simpson
27W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Vickie Ware
49W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Elizabeth Yarbrough
72W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Wendy Applegate
43W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Meredith Wall
33W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Mercy Forsyth
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Harris
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cyndi Harkins
32W–38L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Staples
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amy Lombardo
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Janet Depooter
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Justice
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Ross
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.