Teams

MD.Crumpler

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-30Split 11
L#2 DoublesHolly Neal / Katy Rapp vs Joanne Kearney / Katrina KUCZYNSKI2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Pfrommer / Laura Cerami-Haidri vs Carrie GONZALEZ / Paula Keith6-3, 7-5
2022-09-08vs MD.FlowerLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaty Rapp / Anne Skinner vs Kari Moncrief / Stephanie Pavlick6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Pfrommer / Laura Cerami-Haidri vs Deanna Hart / Katie Scroggins0-6, 1-6
2022-09-01vs TOC.NarulaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Skinner / Kelly Pfrommer vs Kristina Faulkner / Cristina Middleton0-6, 3-6
2022-08-25vs PW.RoussinLost 01
L#3 DoublesHolly Neal / Kelly Pfrommer vs Andrea Agee / Leslie Cramer4-6, 4-6
2022-08-18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Ashley Hill / Katy Rapp vs Andrea Dusina / Kimberly Hall0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Neal / Laura Cerami-Haidri vs Allison Kupfrian / Kim Burgwyn3-6, 2-6
2022-08-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaty Rapp / Niralee Shah vs Joanne Kearney / Jennifer Kuzma1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Jaclyn Englert
published 3
2.72
Katy Rapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Niralee Shah
published
2.60
Laura Cerami-Haidri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Anne Skinner
published 2.5
2.34
Mary Ashley Hill
published
2.30
Annie Pilz
published 2.5
2.30
Kelly Pfrommer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.16
Katherine Ruffolo
published
Blair Diamond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cerami-Haidri + Katy Rapp4648% games+5.7% vs expected
Kelly Pfrommer + Laura Cerami-Haidri123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jaclyn Englert
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Katy Rapp
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Niralee Shah
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%6%94%
2.70
3
Laura Cerami-Haidri
16W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Anne Skinner
3W–0L career · type A · no lines in 2022
0%41%59%
2.53
Mary Ashley Hill
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Annie Pilz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Kelly Pfrommer
27W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
Katherine Ruffolo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Blair Diamond
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.