Teams

Sarasota/Lancer

2023 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 9.0 W Wednesday

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-29vs Payne Park HanniganLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Crowley / Sue Green vs Marika Lindholm / Lynn Thompson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-22vs Plantation DeuitchWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Lyons / Sue Green vs Maureen Thomas / Elizabeth Warrier6-1, 6-3
2023-03-08vs Payne Park HanniganWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Kimball / Debbie Crowley vs Dorene Seider / Deanna Allard6-1, 6-3
2023-03-01vs Plantation DeuitchSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Faunce / Christie Boylston vs Sue Dunn / Ana Areosa6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Kimball / Janet Sperling vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Lee Bailey6-7, 2-6
2023-02-15vs Plantation DeuitchWon 30
W#1 DoublesLilian Peltz-Petow / Janet Sperling vs Maureen Thomas / Susan Gammon7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Jan Kirkland / Susan Kimball vs Beth Costa / Lynn Deuitch6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristie Boylston / Lori Faunce vs Sarah Watson / Lee Bailey6-1, 6-2
2023-02-08vs Payne Park HanniganWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Faunce / Christie Boylston vs Donna Hannigan / Marika Lindholm6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarla Hughes / Janet Sperling vs Kerry Distefano / Lenore Funes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-25vs Payne Park HanniganWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Faunce / Christie Boylston vs Dorene Seider / Deanna Allard6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Kimball / Debbie Crowley vs Wendy Hillock / Constance Duncan6-3, 6-3
2023-01-11vs Plantation DeuitchLost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Green / Kathy McMahon vs Lynn Deuitch / Beth Costa3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.10
Sue Green
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.05
Kathy McMahon
published
3.94
Amy Lyons
published 4.5
3.85
Debbie Crowley
published 4
3.78
Susan Rakay
published 4
Janet Sperling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Faunce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Kimball
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Sue Green
105W–52L career · 9 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Kathy McMahon
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Debbie Crowley
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Susan Rakay
35W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.78
Janet Sperling
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marilyn Jan Kirkland
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Kimball
96W–50L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.