Teams

McMullen Super 7.0

2026 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 7.0 MXD Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-28vs SPTC JacomeWon 21
L#1 DoublesDaniel Kwak / Silvia Kwak vs John Donadio / Danielle Coke7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMony Rodon / Natalie Hensgen vs Wayne Lemmerbrock / Loretta Lombardi7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhillip Jones / Esthela Gonzalez vs Stephen Johnson / Ellen Johnson6-2, 7-6
2026-06-21vs Ardea Mixed 18Won 21
L#1 DoublesMony Rodon / Lisa Hueholt vs Ashton Fritz / Lesli Stolly3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Thompson / Natalie Hensgen vs Steve Unger / Martha Cornatzer7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Connolly / Karen Fischer vs Dane Houston / Robyn Houston7-5, 3-0
2026-06-14vs Seminole Lake Dsa 7.0 XLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiego Lampon / Esthela Gonzalez vs Andres Rodrigues Mortimer / Eileen Rodriguez1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Hensgen / Jonathan Thompson vs James Bettencourt / Jessica Kuzio2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSilvia Kwak / Daniel Kwak vs Jose Dsa / Joan Whitten3-6, 3-6
2026-06-07vs SPTC JacomeLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Kwak / Silvia Kwak vs David Ruelas / Loretta Lombardi6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJonathan Thompson / Karen Fischer vs George Jacome / Lisa Jacome2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhillip Jones / Natalie Hensgen vs Wayne Lemmerbrock / Diane Haymes5-7, 4-6
2026-05-31vs Tarpon Warren MixedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMony Rodon / Lisa Hueholt vs Matthew Johns / Susan Weissler6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatrick Connolly / Gina Timmins vs Aric Aumond / Lauren Aumond4-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs Innisbrook Mixed 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDiego Lampon / Esthela Gonzalez vs Lisa DeGoes / Chris Eck6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJonathan Thompson / Lisa Hueholt vs Gorban Aliak / Patricia Aliak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhillip Jones / Karen Fischer vs Andrew Young / Melissa Bryan4-6, 1-6
2026-05-03vs PINELLAS/HollidayLost 12
W#1 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Diego Lampon vs Nia Kaye / SANJAY GOSALIA6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Thompson / Natalie Hensgen vs Tracy Hodapp / Eugene Holliday1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDiana Zarreke / Daniel Kwak vs Jim Bugden / LaMonica Lovett4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-26vs RCSP Fantauzzo MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Connolly / Callee Lepley vs Kevin Hennessy / Davina Doletzky6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMony Rodon / Natalie Hensgen vs Tisha Maddaloni / Chris Maddaloni2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Fischer / Phillip Jones vs Honganh Tran / Brent Litwak4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-19vs Ardea Mixed 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Hensgen / Mony Rodon vs Noella Burgeson / Christopher Coates6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPhillip Jones / Karen Fischer vs Wendy Unger / Ben Coughanour6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Diana Zarreke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Silvia Kwak
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Callee Lepley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Mony Rodon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Natalie Hensgen
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Jonathan Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.75
Daniel Kwak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gina Timmins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Hueholt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patrick Connolly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mony Rodon + Natalie Hensgen5252% games−3.7% vs expected
Silvia Kwak + Daniel Kwak224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Hensgen + Jonathan Thompson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Zarreke
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Silvia Kwak
64W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.38
3.5
Callee Lepley
34W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Mony Rodon
18W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Natalie Hensgen
29W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Jonathan Thompson
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–146L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Karen Fischer
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Daniel Kwak
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Gina Timmins
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hueholt
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Connolly
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.