Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Haruko Sano
published 4.5
4.42
4.38
Soumi Gupta
published
4.33
Jean To
published
4.32
Sueyin Wong
published
4.27
Caroline Iwanchuk
published 4.5
Hannah Thompson
published 4.5
4.23
Irene Otten
published 4.5
4.18
Miki Lenox
published
4.18
Kristine Avila
published
4.16
Liza Geary
published
4.15
Catherine Vowles
published 4.5
4.11
Jenifer Hartwell
published
4.08
Hope Neighbor
published 4.5
4.00
Jennifer Yeager
published
3.99
Lisa Trusheim
published
3.94
Jana Klein
published
3.89
Rachel Gabato
published
3.79
Janet Lautenberger
published
3.04
Lisa Shaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sueyin Wong + Jennifer Yeager314 matchesnot enough data
Miki Lenox + Caroline Iwanchuk213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Iwanchuk + Soumi Gupta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Haruko Sano
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.53
5
Cara Eckert Jakubowski
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
4.42
Soumi Gupta
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Jean To
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.33
Sueyin Wong
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Caroline Iwanchuk
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Hannah Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Irene Otten
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Miki Lenox
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Kristine Avila
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Catherine Vowles
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jenifer Hartwell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Hope Neighbor
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
Jennifer Yeager
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
4.00
Lisa Trusheim
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
Jana Klein
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.94
Rachel Gabato
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Janet Lautenberger
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Lisa Shaw
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.