Teams

Lavery

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.91 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-01vs WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllery Payton Jr / Kunle Gbadamosi vs Gregory Teal / Steven Edwards1-6, 0-6
2024-05-21vs WalshLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Lumb / Desmond LaMar vs Steven Edwards / William Ravekes1-6, 3-6
2024-05-06vs Atom SmashersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex Lumb / Elmer Buddy Baylor vs Mark Flanegan / Umer Farooq0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDallas Hoff / William Baldwin vs Matt Gogarty / Damien Morris7-5, 6-2
2024-04-30vs WalshLost 02
L#2 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / Kunle Gbadamosi vs Tom Walsh / Hal Bloom6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDallas Hoff vs Patrick Bernhard0-6, 0-6
2024-04-21vs Atom SmashersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDallas Hoff / Paul Estipona vs Chris Elcock / David Djajaputra1-6, 2-6
2024-04-08vs Atom SmashersLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarry Laurent / Dallas Hoff vs Charles Mandeville / David Djajaputra1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDesmond LaMar vs Trevon Jensen2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElmer Buddy Baylor / William Baldwin vs Matt Gogarty / Tom Erdely7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Eric Price
published
3.09
UMA SRIKUMARAN
published 3
2.93
David Connell
published 2.5
2.92
Todd Voong
published
2.86
Desmond LaMar
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Kunle Gbadamosi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Barry Laurent
published 3
Benjamin Hsieh
published 3
2.73
Alex Lumb
published 3
2.68
Douglass Lamartin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
David Pim
published 3
2.64
Dallas Hoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.30
Elmer Buddy Baylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Price
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
UMA SRIKUMARAN
53W–69L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
2.5
David Connell
2W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Todd Voong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Kunle Gbadamosi
37W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Barry Laurent
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Benjamin Hsieh
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alex Lumb
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Douglass Lamartin
38W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
David Pim
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Dallas Hoff
17W–22L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Elmer Buddy Baylor
72W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.