Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-17vs Escambia/Tan/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Julie Sowell vs Cherie Tan / Melanie Bell4-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Essex - SHLWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Emily Mattes vs Kelly Dantino / Sandra Wilson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-03vs McElhany - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Emily Mattes vs Creagh Ekelund / Jennifer Capozzoli3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-27vs Escambia/Tan/18&Over3.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Jill Kunkel vs Aivel Dadisman / Jessica Gonterman7-6, 7-6
2025-05-13vs McElhany - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Mattes / Mary Bryan vs Denise Wilson / Lisa Andresen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Emily Mattes
published
3.47
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.41
Jill Kunkel
published
3.38
Van Hughes
published 3.5
3.31
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
Caroline Struck
published 3.5
3.21
Mary Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.14
Terri Ammons
published
3.14
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
Joyce Cook
published
Julie Sowell
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kunkel + Terri Ammons16563% games+6.7% vs expected
Van Hughes + Mary Bryan3844% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Mattes
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jill Kunkel
41W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Caroline Struck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Terri Ammons
62W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Katie Cooper-Bussell
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Joyce Cook
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Sowell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.