Teams

SS-LT ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs CPV REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Montini / Carol Parrish vs Liz Bauer / Mary Lostak3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Porter / Colleen Krebsbach vs Carol Lail / Anthea Gerberg4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Naylon vs Jami Keenan4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlison Cejka / Julie Johns vs Elizabeth Zeller / Jill Fox6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs PRC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Adele Rhinehart vs Julie Hernandez / Erin Jones4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Alison Cejka vs Karen Eagleton / Bernadette Rottschafer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Joyce Naylon vs Kathleen Beyes / Leslie Hathaway1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-16vs PRC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Johns / Colleen Krebsbach vs Allison Stewart / Donna Chan1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNancy Montini vs Angela D'Alessandro5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCinda Nab / Alison Cejka vs Georgina Swales / Kristen Arsenault0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Naylon vs Jennifer Benson4-6, 1-6
2024-05-09vs HRCA-S YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Anderson / Julie Johns vs Brooke Sterling / Olivia Zuncic4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Miller / Adele Rhinehart vs Claudia Swanson / Cami Schaefer2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNancy Montini vs Kathleen Samuelli6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlison Cejka / Cinda Nab vs Lisa Stark / Gretchen Burr6-7, 4-6
2024-05-03vs PCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Anderson / Adele Rhinehart vs Cait Dutcher / Julie Zaveral4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Miller / Julie Johns vs Meagan Minshall / Sarah Fitzpatrick6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Joyce Naylon vs Sandra Liberati / Kelly Bromeier3-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs RRTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Dana Anderson vs Heather Kelly / Michelle Aikin6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Cejka / Cinda Nab vs Maureen Breitenbach / Kassandra Hurley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Nancy Montini vs Heather McGinnis / Marla Roper2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-25vs PCRK REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Alison Cejka vs Kellie Shurtz / Debra Kuebler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Dana Anderson vs Tina Book / Stacy Cieraszynski6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Joyce Naylon vs Gina Roth / Pamela Smith6-1, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Shannon Porter
published
3.27
Nancy Montini
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Adele Rhinehart
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Alison Cejka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
published 3.5
3.04
Colleen Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Amy Tharp
published 3.5
2.92
Julie Johns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Cinda Nab
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Carol Parrish
published 3
2.85
Marika Fodor
published 3.5
2.76
Joyce Naylon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Cejka + Colleen Krebsbach3648% games+3.8% vs expected
Alison Cejka + Shannon Porter5257% games+2.7% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Julie Johns21144% games+1.6% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Carol Parrish81149% games+1.6% vs expected
Adele Rhinehart + Julie Johns2448% games+1.3% vs expected
Cinda Nab + Joyce Naylon171846% games−5.7% vs expected
Colleen Krebsbach + Julie Johns6448% games−6.5% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Adele Rhinehart1742% games−8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Porter
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Nancy Montini
119W–86L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alison Cejka
70W–99L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Dana Anderson
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Colleen Krebsbach
63W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Tharp
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Julie Johns
29W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Cinda Nab
52W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Carol Parrish
14W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3.5
Marika Fodor
21W–33L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Joyce Naylon
109W–163L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.