Teams

State College - Price / Kapustik

Northern Tier - 18 & Over Adults · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-09vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasLost 03
L#1 DoublesGiang Nguyen / Christine McDonald vs Becky Moore / Allie Smith0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChloe Cho vs Huijun Shen3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNora Vizzini vs Anastasia Piliouras2-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasLost 13
W#1 DoublesMaggie Doby / Cari Gustafson vs Deb Johnson / Peggy Duffie6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDiana Zimmerman vs Anastasia Piliouras1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Butler / Nora Vizzini vs Yoon Hur / Anna Childe3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesChloe Cho vs Huijun Shen2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesNora Vizzini / Natalie Kapustik vs Christa Oelhaf / Allison Fleming7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChloe Cho vs Margaret ELLIS7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine McDonald / Cari Gustafson vs Natasha Miles / Deb Johnson0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMaggie Doby vs Peggy Duffie6-4, 6-3
2025-07-02vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDiana Zimmerman / Natalie Kapustik vs Becky Moore / Janet Bristol6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMaggie Doby vs Peggy Duffie6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine McDonald / Ana Butler vs Allison Fleming / Samantha Longo6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesNora Vizzini vs Margaret ELLIS2-6, 2-6
2025-06-11vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasLost 03
L#1 DoublesNora Vizzini / Giang Nguyen vs Anastasia Piliouras / Deb Johnson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Simmons vs Becky Moore3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChristine McDonald vs Margaret ELLIS0-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasLost 03
L#1 DoublesChloe Cho / Guadalupe Marti-Pena vs Peggy Duffie / Deb Johnson0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDiana Zimmerman vs Christa Oelhaf4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Simmons / Ana Butler vs Margaret ELLIS / Sheridan Miyamoto1-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJulie Simmons / Svetla Vitanova vs Janet Bristol / Peggy Duffie0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie Kapustik vs Samantha Longo6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGiang Nguyen / Ana Butler vs Anna Childe / Natasha Miles2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChloe Cho vs Allie Smith7-5, 6-1
2025-05-28vs State College - Duffie / PiliourasLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Zimmerman / Julie Simmons vs Margaret ELLIS / Sheridan Miyamoto2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChloe Cho vs Allie Smith4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAna Butler / Guadalupe Marti-Pena vs Yoon Hur / Mariah Harmon2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMaggie Doby / Patricia Craig vs Becky Moore / Allison Fleming6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDiana Zimmerman vs Huijun Shen0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCari Gustafson / Julie Simmons vs Mariah Harmon / Anna Childe6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1State College - Duffie / Piliouras09241225223
2State College - Price / Kapustik09122453370

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Maggie Doby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.98
Chloe Cho
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.93
Natalie Kapustik
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.78
Nora Vizzini
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Cari Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Diana Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.36
Ana Butler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christine McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Giang Nguyen
published
Guadalupe Marti-Pena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Svetla Vitanova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nora Vizzini + Natalie Kapustik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Doby
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Chloe Cho
12W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Natalie Kapustik
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Nora Vizzini
5W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cari Gustafson
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Zimmerman
3W–11L career · type A · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Ana Butler
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Christine McDonald
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Giang Nguyen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Marti-Pena
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Simmons
9W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Craig
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Svetla Vitanova
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.