Teams

MP:OnTheRise:Coffin

2021 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.07 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-06vs RFC:TheYoungAndTheRestofUs:HerreraLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynne Chicoine / Amy Chiu vs Anna Podnecky / Donna Dwyer6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEllen Konieczko vs Alexandra Epstein3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGeorgia Ahlers / Lorena Coffin vs Silvia Toms / Carolyn Wachnicki1-6, 2-6
2021-05-15vs RFC:TheYoungAndTheRestofUs:HerreraLost 14
W#1 DoublesAmy Chiu / Betsy Evans vs Heidi Herrera / Kelly Anchors7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNatalie Egbert vs Caroline Ray2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Konieczko / Catherine York Powers vs Anna Podnecky / Carolyn Wachnicki2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGeorgia Ahlers vs Izzy Evans3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLorena Coffin / Deanna Mao vs Jocelyn Bolt / Sharon Wedge4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-24vs RFC:TheYoungAndTheRestofUs:HerreraLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmy Chiu / Lynne Chicoine vs Donna Dwyer / Anna Podnecky3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaggie Wheeler vs Alexandra Epstein3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Kingsley / Kristen Martin vs Heidi Herrera / Kelly Anchors4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLorena Coffin vs Izzy Evans3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Harradon / Ellen Konieczko vs Silvia Toms / Sharon Wedge5-7, 4-6
2021-04-11vs RFC:TheYoungAndTheRestofUs:HerreraLost 14
L#1 DoublesLorena Coffin / Ann Harradon vs Izzy Evans / Caroline Ray5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGeorgia Ahlers vs Alexandra Epstein6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolcott / Kristen Martin vs Anna Podnecky / Donna Dwyer1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMaggie Wheeler vs Jocelyn Bolt6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Chiu / Lynne Chicoine vs Heidi Herrera / Kelly Anchors2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TheYoungAndTheRestofUs:Herrera3114615161
2MP:OnTheRise:Coffin1361430196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Georgia Ahlers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Natalie Egbert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.86
Deanna Mao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Amy Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Ellen Konieczko
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ann Harradon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Betsy Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Catherine York Powers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Lorena Coffin
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Jennifer Wolcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Kristen Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Betsy Evans
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynne Chicoine
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Maggie Wheeler
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Chiu + Lynne Chicoine14956% games+3.5% vs expected
Lorena Coffin + Lynne Chicoine5162% games+0.2% vs expected
Deanna Mao + Kristen Martin2342% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Coffin + Amy Chiu404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Wolcott + Kristen Martin134 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Coffin + Ann Harradon213 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Coffin + Kristen Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Chiu + Catherine York Powers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Georgia Ahlers
17W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
Natalie Egbert
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2021
21%78%<1%
4.10
4
Deanna Mao
110W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Amy Chiu
43W–33L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ellen Konieczko
149W–75L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ann Harradon
79W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Betsy Kingsley
1W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Catherine York Powers
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lorena Coffin
94W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Jennifer Wolcott
38W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
Kristen Martin
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Betsy Evans
9W–0L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lynne Chicoine
39W–20L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maggie Wheeler
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.