Teams

Spring 2

Holding Leagues · Holding Spring

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NEW JERSEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Holding Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spring 1000000
2Spring 2000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Karen Potaski
published 4
3.48
Rachel Marx
published
3.43
Robert Sison
published
3.33
Astik Risal
published 3.5
3.32
Prasada Vontipenta
published
3.24
Krishna Pendyala
published
3.19
Maria Levine
published
2.99
Jacqueline Olsson
published
2.80
Lucia Marchetta
published 3
2.76
Jill Pincus
published
2.52
Debra Schoengood
published 3
Elizabeth Egan
published
Pamela Lowe
published
Scott Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucia Marchetta + Jill Pincus4253% games+2.8% vs expected
Debra Schoengood + Lucia Marchetta134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Potaski
69W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Rachel Marx
45W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Robert Sison
33W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Astik Risal
6W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Prasada Vontipenta
147W–101L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Krishna Pendyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Maria Levine
20W–27L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jacqueline Olsson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Lucia Marchetta
100W–87L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Jill Pincus
30W–46L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Debra Schoengood
23W–40L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Elizabeth Egan
48W–60L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Lowe
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Gordon
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.