Teams

OKWC-Johnson

Adult 18 & Over August 5-7, 2022 · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Norman/18&Over4.0W000000
2IA-REG-Hill-Matthes&Fink/18&Over4.0W000000
3KS-REG-Osborne/18&Over4.0W000000
4MO-REG-Stein/18&Over4.0W000000
5NE-REG-Harrison/Adams000000
6OK-Reg-Vann/Harris000000
7STL-REG-Harris000000
8OKWC-Johnson000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Grace Johnson
published 4
3.58
Jamie Wells
published 4
3.57
Rachell Mariano
published
3.48
MacHelle Wright
published
3.46
Laila Pfau
published
3.42
Maricel Kuhn
published
3.03
Kathryn Alarcon
published
2.87
Karen Pilcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricel Kuhn + Laila Pfau6651% games+6.6% vs expected
Kathryn Alarcon + Rachell Mariano5454% games−0.9% vs expected
Maricel Kuhn + MacHelle Wright1442% gamesnot enough data
MacHelle Wright + Jamie Wells123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grace Johnson
37W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jamie Wells
39W–62L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Rachell Mariano
75W–62L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57
MacHelle Wright
109W–114L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Laila Pfau
95W–101L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Maricel Kuhn
46W–70L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kathryn Alarcon
30W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Karen Pilcher
30W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.