Teams

Der - Carnivores 4.5

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-01vs Copsey 4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Andrew Gibbons4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSean Der vs Andrew Aylward6-3, 6-1
2025-10-27vs Yee - Hoco Noon Ballers 4.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesSean Der vs William Nsoesie2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Alan Karnofsky6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-22vs Yee - Hoco Noon Ballers 4.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs William Nsoesie3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGregory Selby vs Alan Karnofsky5-7, 0-1
2025-10-16vs Ok - HoCo Moon Ballers 4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Anirudh Poruri7-5, 6-5
2025-10-08vs Dragonette - Dragon 4.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Bradley Kline6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGregory Selby vs David Rowlett6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEston Harden vs David Kline6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Copsey 4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Douglas Hamilton6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEston Harden vs Ethan Fischer6-7, 1-6
2025-10-01vs Dragonette - Dragon 4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Luis Ruiz7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesGregory Selby vs Rob Dragonette6-3, 6-3
2025-09-29vs Ok - HoCo Moon Ballers 4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Johan Holmberg6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGregory Selby vs Ian Furey6-3, 6-2
2025-09-11vs HocoCha 4.5SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesHenry McVeigh vs Ryan Cinoman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Henry McVeigh
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4.5
4.35
Koby Bonta
published
4.20
Gregory Selby
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Jeison de Guzman
published
4.03
Eston Harden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Sean Der
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Janardhan Devireddy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Henry McVeigh
170W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.56
Koby Bonta
28W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Gregory Selby
56W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Jeison de Guzman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Eston Harden
68W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Sean Der
257W–135L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Janardhan Devireddy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.