Teams

HOF: Daigle

2023 RI TRI Level · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / RHODE ISLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesAngela Miller / Alison Daigle vs Tabatha Ashton / Kirsty Morrison2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-12-03vs EB: LFG/Laforge/gustafsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Daigle / Angela Miller vs Fallon Laforge / Crosby Modrowski6-7, 3-6
2023-12-02vs EB: LFG/Laforge/gustafsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Daigle / Katie Tingley vs Fallon Laforge / Lihsiu Hou6-7, 3-5
2023-11-28vs CC: DiNardoLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Tingley / Alison Daigle vs Nancy DiNardo / Jennifer Leite2-6, 5-7
2023-11-18vs WB: Pembroke/CeceriLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Gerety / Katie Tingley vs Daniella Norwood / Caroline Ceceri1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKristen Gerety / Angela Miller vs Kirsty Morrison / Lauren Marsh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-11vs WB: Pembroke/CeceriLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Miller / Alison Daigle vs Caroline Ceceri / Leslie Beaulieu3-6, 2-6
2023-10-06vs CC: DiNardoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Daigle / Katie Tingley vs Jennifer Leite / Nancy DiNardo3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WB: Padula/Lawton0743766
2EB: Litmanovich/Zhukov07251282
3WB: Freitas0880023
4EB: Btown Biddies/Pippitt0880150
5EB: LFG/Laforge/gustafson0880265
6CC: DiNardo0853669
7RP: Curran/Davis0853771
8WB: Pembroke/Ceceri0853873
9CC: Texeira/Chanfrau0853979
10HOF: Griffin/Brown08441076
11RP: Werchadlo/Tucci08351074
12WB: Meyer08441181
13WB: Sets in the City/DeLuca/Salvator08351186
14CC: Preve/Paletta08351287
15CC: Kelly08261382
16FC: Siempre Tennis/Fontes/Eteinvre08171594
17WB: Jamestown Rockstars/Ashton.Marsh08171588
18HOF: Daigle08171590
19FC: Dark Horses/Donnelly/Mangiaratti08081689

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Alison Daigle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Katie Tingley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Gerety
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Tingley + Alison Daigle044 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tingley + Kristen Gerety213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Gerety + Alison Daigle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Daigle
21W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.39
Katie Tingley
93W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kristen Gerety
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.