Teams

Chant/Murfreesboro

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Murfreesboro · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs Burnstein/MurfreesboroLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulie Segura / Hollie Williams vs Lacey Keally / Stacey Wood5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSiprachanh Chanthaphaychith vs Kristin Dennis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMyrvete Korenberg / Melisma Ramos vs Julie Burnstein / Briana Mullenax4-6, 6-6
W#3 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Sara Baker vs Lisa Yawn / Dodson Randolph7-6, 6-3
2026-05-16vs Feyes/MurfreesboroLost 04
L#1 DoublesSiprachanh Chanthaphaychith / Hollie Williams vs Betsy Delves / Stephanie Feyes1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLily Qu vs Paula Mcgowan1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Kaly Bush / Shannon Smith5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClair Cochran / Janet Prentice vs Katie Feyes / Loralie Liggett6-7, 2-6
2026-05-09vs Burnstein/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesSiprachanh Chanthaphaychith / Julie Segura vs Morgan Hinkley / Stacey Wood2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Sara Baker vs Julie Burnstein / Briana Mullenax3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMyrvete Korenberg / Melisma Ramos vs Lisa Yawn / Angie Wesley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Feyes/MurfreesboroLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Katherine Goodson / Colleen Andrews6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Zimmer vs Kaly Bush6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSiprachanh Chanthaphaychith / Jeanine Dyer vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Stacey Andrews1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Gibbs / Sara Baker vs Kathleen Carbonari / Carrie Jones0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Clair Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jeanine Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Melisma Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Brenda Monajjem
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Alicia Zimmer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.60
Julie Segura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Hollie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Janet Prentice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Sara Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Sara Baker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Lily Qu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Myrvete Korenberg
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Brandy Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hollie Williams + Suzanne Spalding4154% games+11.7% vs expected
Sara Baker + Sara Gibbs9652% games+5.2% vs expected
Julie Segura + Hollie Williams1739% games−7.0% vs expected
Jan Phanthalangsy + Brenda Monajjem044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Rudolph
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Clair Cochran
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeanine Dyer
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Melisma Ramos
98W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Brenda Monajjem
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Alicia Zimmer
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Julie Segura
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Hollie Williams
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Janet Prentice
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Sara Gibbs
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
Sara Baker
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Lily Qu
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Myrvete Korenberg
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brandy Kennedy
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.