Teams

Western: Sandstorm

2021 18&Over Men · 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-27vs WilbonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Nussbaumer / Donald Nowak vs Rob Udy / Andrew Puleo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnthony Colavito vs Andrew Cohn1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTimothy Sands / Eric Patton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-07vs WilbonWon 21
W#2 DoublesTimothy Sands / Robert Kalson vs Andrew Miller / Andrew Thompson6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAnthony Colavito vs Bryan Matthews1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth McCoy / Sean Waters vs Jordan Crouch / Jim Texter6-3, 6-1
2021-06-30vs DomzalskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenneth McCoy / Sean Waters vs Gordy Sage / Kerry Freeburg7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs WilbonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonald Nowak / Eric Patton vs Bryan Matthews / Andrew Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTimothy Sands vs Zachary Shilvock6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Nussbaumer / Sean Waters vs Andrew Thompson / William Whisker5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-09vs DomzalskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Nussbaumer / Michael Rusk vs Thomas Baldinger / Joe Bartelo6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTimothy Sands vs Declan Watson6-0, 6-0
2021-05-19vs DomzalskiWon 30
W#2 DoublesJohn Nussbaumer / Geoffrey Becker vs James Domzalski / Gordy Sage6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTimothy Sands vs Michael O'Leyar6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKenneth McCoy / Sean Waters vs Mark Szafnicki / Michael Galang6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Sandstorm5122820204
2Domzalski1481737262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
John Nussbaumer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Anthony Colavito
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Donald Nowak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeff Shiff
published
Kenneth McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Waters
published
Timothy Sands
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Nussbaumer
23W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Anthony Colavito
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Donald Nowak
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Shiff
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth McCoy
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sean Waters
42W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Timothy Sands
46W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.