Teams

Broward/MissionBay/Loren

2026 Broward Adult 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-03vs Veltri/WankWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlba Johnson / Maria Valeria O'Reilly vs Lorena Villar / Cristina Tomadin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-19vs Veltri/WankWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Ina Gluck / Veronica Wank7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Ellis / Rose Haney vs Clarena Furtado / Cristina Tomadin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGwen Guidice / Tina Preville vs Sharon Runk / Ana Pastorino6-3, 6-3
2026-03-15vs Veltri/KoonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Preville / Gwen Guidice vs Barbara Mariani / Elisabeth Weiss6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMona Giovanni / Karen Ellis vs Johanne Mallette / Sarah Nickoson5-7, 6-7
2026-02-22vs Veltri/KoonLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Preville / Loren Levine vs Barbara Mariani / Rosa Waters7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-15vs Veltri/WankWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Tina Preville vs Kumiko Currie / Ana Pastorino6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaria Valeria O'Reilly / Katherine Shadid vs Cristina Tomadin / Clarena Furtado1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-09vs Veltri/KoonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoren Levine / Edith Schmidt vs Johanne Mallette / Sarah Nickoson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Ellis / Mona Giovanni vs Barbara Mariani / Elisabeth Weiss6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy DeLoach / Sharon Dutkiewicz vs Kathy Koon / Pam Fisher6-1, 7-5
2026-01-25vs Veltri/WankWon 21
W#1 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Lori Paglini / Kim Brown3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Ellis / Tina Preville vs Kumiko Currie / Tammy Gibson7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHermine Greene / Maria Elena Rojas vs Shari Silver / Lorena Villar2-6, 4-6
2026-01-11vs Veltri/KoonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy DeLoach / Sharon Dutkiewicz vs Catherine McManus / Rosa Waters6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Edith Schmidt vs Bea Tully / Pam Fisher6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Broward/MissionBay/Loren6216822214
2Veltri/Koon1751942277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Hermine Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Edith Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
Tina Preville
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Katherine Shadid
published 4
3.85
Karen Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Amy DeLoach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Maria Valeria O'Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Alba Johnson
published 4
Gwen Guidice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
3.72
Sharon Dutkiewicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Loren Levine
published 4
3.62
Rose Haney
published 4
3.52
Mona Giovanni
published 4
3.43
Maria Brozzi
published 4
3.22
Carrie Webster
published 3.5
3.07
Maria Elena Rojas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mirella Sprinckmoller + Edith Schmidt6060% games+6.6% vs expected
Mirella Sprinckmoller + Maria Valeria O'Reilly8257% games+4.6% vs expected
Amy DeLoach + Sharon Dutkiewicz4252% games−0.7% vs expected
Loren Levine + Edith Schmidt6357% games−3.2% vs expected
Rose Haney + Alba Johnson4251% games−4.7% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + Maria Brozzi2738% games−6.6% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + Mirella Sprinckmoller3256% gamesnot enough data
Loren Levine + Mirella Sprinckmoller2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hermine Greene
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Edith Schmidt
52W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
Tina Preville
60W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Karen Ellis
104W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Amy DeLoach
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Maria Valeria O'Reilly
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alba Johnson
186W–125L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gwen Guidice
9W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Mirella Sprinckmoller
76W–63L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Sharon Dutkiewicz
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Rose Haney
62W–90L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Mona Giovanni
100W–65L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Maria Brozzi
152W–217L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Carrie Webster
12W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Maria Elena Rojas
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.