Teams

UPTA18A/Bradbrook/Pavillion

2026 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 3.0- 18+ Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-17vs UPTA18A/Brading/HollyTreeLost 05
L#1 DoublesBobbi Bateman / Laura Borck vs Blair Brading / Tabitha Taylor3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShanda Davey vs Alicia Walters0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Henry / Maryn Canniff vs Suzy Clary / Jillian Jensen2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMolly Woods vs Madina Cauthen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTina Langley / Melissa Studebaker vs Rachel Graeber / Gretchen Lawson0-6, 5-7
2026-04-10vs UPTA18A/Blum/GCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesJaime Stevens / Susan Tomforde vs Susanne Norwood / Catherine Webb6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrandi Bradbrook vs Cate Taylor6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Studebaker / Maryteal Oneal vs Marquin Campbell / Hanna Lane2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Dawson / Maryn Canniff vs Carley Victor / Melanie Albers6-4, 6-2
2026-04-02vs UPTA18A/Knight/RiverWalkLost 04
L#1 DoublesJamie Dawson / Bobbi Bateman vs Jessa Shiner / Lucie Bujetova Sliva5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrandi Bradbrook vs Meg Powers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJaime Stevens / Molly Woods vs Jennifer Aughtry / Erica Ritter2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Studebaker / Maryteal Oneal vs Michelle Callahan / Lauren Young3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-26vs UPTA18A/Benfield/Sugar CreekWon 41
L#1 DoublesAlice Izzard / Jaime Stevens vs Erin Benfield / Marissa Moore3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrandi Bradbrook vs Cristina Torres6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Borck / Jamie Dawson vs Covington Carson / Sara Fox6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSusan Tomforde vs Kim Barrs5-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Henry / Maryn Canniff vs Kristen Belflower / Mary Nunes6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-13vs UPTA (A) 3.0W 18 & Over (Zeimetz)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesMaryn Canniff / Alice Izzard vs Cady Johnson / Beth Anne Eads7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrandi Bradbrook vs Heather Lynn7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaryteal Oneal / Susan Tomforde vs JB Robinson / Sandy Buol0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Rehn vs Virginia Brannon2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Studebaker / Molly Woods vs Rebekah Fedrowitz / Sandy Shaw1-6, 4-6
2026-03-06vs UPTA18A/Faust/ThornbladeLost 05
L#1 DoublesBrandi Bradbrook / Alice Izzard vs Sarah Faust / Erin Byxbee2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAshley Rehn vs Riley Smith1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaryteal Oneal / Jaime Stevens vs Jamie Flaherty / Amy Rogers2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMolly Woods vs Millie Bridges6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Henry / Shanda Davey vs Amy Kimbell / Deidre LaVigne5-7, 5-7
2026-03-04vs UPTA18A/Busby-Frank/GCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesMaryteal Oneal / Melissa Studebaker vs Emily Busby / Rachel Vick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAshley Rehn vs Katie Phipps3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaryn Canniff / Anne Henry vs Stacy Alexandrou / Christy Glenn4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBrandi Bradbrook vs Holly Sellers6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Borck / Susan Tomforde vs Victoria Robinson / Kasey Frank6-0, 6-1
2026-02-27vs UPTA18A/Posta/SouthsideLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrandi Bradbrook / Maryn Canniff vs Eunice Samuel / Gloria Bleasdale6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaryteal Oneal vs Natallia Sianko0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Borck / Jaime Stevens vs Rachael Cariveau / Lauren Nelson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMolly Woods vs Katy Davidson0-6, 0-6
2026-02-13vs UPTA18A/Pelino/PavillionLost 05
L#1 DoublesMelissa Studebaker / Anne Henry vs Gina Pelino / Crystal Rogers4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Tomforde vs Brie Soler2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaryteal Oneal / Bobbi Bateman vs Lora Pfohl / Mary Sansbury4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShanda Davey vs Brooke Jones0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrandi Bradbrook / Tina Langley vs Kerra McAdams / Lauren Smith3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0- 18+ Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 3.0W 18 & Over (Zeimetz)9039620255
2UPTA18A/Pelino/Pavillion72261943363
3UPTA18A/Blum/GCC63291637319
4UPTA18A/Knight/RiverWalk63301539327
5UPTA18A/Brading/HollyTree54271844367
6UPTA18A/Busby-Frank/GCC45212453405
7UPTA18A/Faust/Thornblade36162961428
8UPTA18A/Bradbrook/Pavillion36113472460
9UPTA18A/Benfield/Sugar Creek18153063449
10UPTA18A/Posta/Southside18113473473

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Laura Borck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Alice Izzard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Maryteal Oneal
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.53
Brandi Bradbrook
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Susan Tomforde
usually #3 Doubles 20%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.49
Bobbi Bateman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.42
Jaime Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.42
Jamie Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Ashley Rehn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.37
Melissa Studebaker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.35
Molly Woods
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.09
Maryn Canniff
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.93
Shanda Davey
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tina Langley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maryn Canniff + Melissa Studebaker3742% games+8.4% vs expected
Melissa Studebaker + Maryteal Oneal6257% games+6.7% vs expected
Brandi Bradbrook + Ashley Rehn3351% games+5.9% vs expected
Bobbi Bateman + Jaime Stevens044 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Jamie Dawson134 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Susan Tomforde314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Borck + Bobbi Bateman213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Borck + Jaime Stevens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Borck
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.59
3
Alice Izzard
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
2.56
Maryteal Oneal
23W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
3
Brandi Bradbrook
10W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Susan Tomforde
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Bobbi Bateman
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Jaime Stevens
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Jamie Dawson
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
2.5
Ashley Rehn
11W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Melissa Studebaker
26W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Molly Woods
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35
Maryn Canniff
23W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Shanda Davey
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Tina Langley
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.