Teams

Twin Hickory Yu

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-14vs WOCC StringerLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Liz Charles2-6, 3-6
2023-06-09vs SCC Nobles / ConsolvoWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Carla Shaffer6-0, 6-4
2023-06-07vs SCC CacciottiWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Karin Speizer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-02vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Carol Beth Cook6-1, 6-0
2023-05-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Sonja Wilkey6-3, 6-3
2023-05-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Hilary Huffstetler6-0, 6-1
2023-05-24vs Kings Charter RamserWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Victoria Galiffa7-5, 7-5
2023-05-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Susan Long6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Corinne Skevington
published 3.5
3.19
Michelle Yu
published
3.13
Jennifer Schwarz
published
3.06
Cathy Parker
published 3
2.88
Amy Buckberg
published 3
2.75
Mary Apruzzese
published
2.69
Penny Kivett
published
2.59
Linda Green
published
Holly Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Skevington + Jennifer Schwarz134 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Vaughan + Jennifer Schwarz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–177L career · 14 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Corinne Skevington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Michelle Yu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Schwarz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Cathy Parker
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Amy Buckberg
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Mary Apruzzese
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.75
Penny Kivett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Linda Green
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Holly Hamilton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.