Teams

HCC - K. Hansen

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Abby Kronk vs KAREN HARKEY / Judi Alford0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Abby Kronk vs Sonia Patrick / Barbara Young7-5, 6-1
2022-02-10vs River Hills - A. SandersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAspen Kahl / Marcy Faircloth vs Bobbi Witt / Julie Wakefield4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAbby Kronk / Marcy Faircloth vs Judi Alford / Karen Blount4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAspen Kahl / Jillene Davis vs Stephanie Means / Maki Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-15vs River Hills - A. SandersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesInha Kharchuk / Aspen Kahl vs Christina Dorothy / Julie Wakefield6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Andria Owen
published 4.5
Abigail Pellett
published 4.5
Amy Shoukry
published 4.5
4.23
Kayla Dyer
published
4.18
Abby Kronk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
4.04
Ann Carlson
published 4.5
3.94
Aspen Kahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Ethel Murphy
published 4
Jillene Davis
published
Kimberly French
published
Patricia Brawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Drukteinis + Aspen Kahl314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andria Owen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Abigail Pellett
56W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Amy Shoukry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kayla Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Abby Kronk
69W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
4.05
4.5
Ann Carlson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Aspen Kahl
111W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.94
4
Ethel Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly French
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Brawley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.