Teams

Team Purple

2023 18-39 League -- LA · Open 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-12vs Team GoldWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Sherman / Julia Igel vs Brenna Opelka / Laura Smalec6-4, 7-5
2023-08-04vs Team GoldWon 10
W#2 DoublesKara Brevet / Reanne Charuhas vs Kamila Edwards / Brenna Opelka6-1, 6-3
2023-07-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKara Brevet / Jeanne Tong vs J Patel / Lauren Wrenn6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesReanne Charuhas / Dorie Speer vs Sarah Mills / Laura Smalec6-2, 6-3
2023-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesTARUN TYAGI / Kara Brevet vs Mark Winters / J Patel6-0, 6-3
2023-07-09vs Team GoldLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulia Igel / Paige Triplett vs Brenna Opelka / Kamila Edwards6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Reanne Charuhas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Elyse Wolin
published 3.5
3.37
Dorie Speer
published 3.5
3.28
Gloria Liu
published 3.5
3.24
Paige Triplett
published
3.02
Elliot MacNeille
published 3
2.95
Kara Brevet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Sara Sherman
published
2.91
TARUN TYAGI
published
2.80
Julia Igel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Anna Floersch
published 3
2.13
Jeanne Tong
published
2.08
Katelyn Guza
published
2.07
Melinda Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Brevet + Reanne Charuhas8456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Reanne Charuhas
122W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.84
3.5
Elyse Wolin
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Dorie Speer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Gloria Liu
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Paige Triplett
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Elliot MacNeille
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Kara Brevet
64W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Sara Sherman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
TARUN TYAGI
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Julia Igel
50W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Anna Floersch
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Jeanne Tong
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Katelyn Guza
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melinda Martinez
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.