Teams

Canterbury NR

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Combo Doubles - Weeknight 18&over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-16vs Zimmer TTC Combo 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Phillips / Nancy Cunningham vs Ciana Ortiguera / Katherine Garayanala2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Elizabeth Bearden vs Lynne Tiffin / Olivia Outlaw1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrenna Askew / Allison Espey vs Robin Holley / Elizabeth Eberhart1-6, 1-6
2025-09-02vs Zimmer TTC Combo 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Phillips / Allison Espey vs Megan Hartin / Taylor Baggett1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Rowley / Rhonda Allen vs Ashlyn Cash / Lynne Tiffin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarina Williams / Linda Canterbury vs Robin Holley / Elizabeth Eberhart4-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs Zimmer TTC Combo 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPasquale Tosyali / Rhonda Allen vs Roberta Leach / Taylor Baggett1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Jill Rowley vs Melissa Jacobs / Olivia Outlaw2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErin Swann / Cynthia Walker vs Ciana Ortiguera / Robin Holley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Espey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Dindy Davis
published
2.86
Cynthia Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Marina Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jill Rowley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Alison Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Linda Canterbury
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.41
Pasquale Tosyali
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.33
Brenna Askew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Elizabeth Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Swann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Phillips + Pasquale Tosyali213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Espey
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Dindy Davis
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
3.5
Cynthia Walker
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.86
Marina Williams
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Jill Rowley
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
3
Alison Phillips
18W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Linda Canterbury
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Pasquale Tosyali
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
3
Brenna Askew
5W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
Elizabeth Bearden
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erin Swann
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.