Teams

SFV LLW - The 300's 55+ Aldo Argana

2024 Adult 55+ SFV Spring · SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-11vs SFV - Jurassic LakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Peter Schuster vs Ken Robbins / Gonzalo Suarez1-2
2024-06-29vs SFV - LegendsWon 20
W#2 DoublesTerry Hazell / Edmond Avedisian vs James Miller / Philip Smith6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShimon Nofar / Gary Weinzimer vs Jacobus Admiraal / Patrick Novak6-1, 6-1
2024-06-02vs SFV - Jurassic LakersWon 10
W#3 DoublesGary Weinzimer / Shimon Nofar vs Nadim Karim / Alex Menegaz6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Daniel Nolan
published 4.5
4.12
Jaime Barajas
published
3.83
Dave Faciana
published 4
3.82
Eric Schaefer
published
3.81
Shimon Nofar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Mark Lipsky
published
3.76
William Landrum
published
Chris Gennusa
published 4
3.75
Terry Hazell
published
3.67
Steve Oetomo
published
3.59
Edmond Avedisian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Ben Hernandez
published 3.5
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Frank Marco
published
Gary Weinzimer
published
Joe Tomasello
published
Peter Schuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Landrum + Eric Schaefer4250% games−12.9% vs expected
Dave Faciana + Mark Lipsky314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Nolan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Jaime Barajas
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
4.12
4
Dave Faciana
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Mark Lipsky
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
William Landrum
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chris Gennusa
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Hazell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Ben Hernandez
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Frank Marco
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary Weinzimer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joe Tomasello
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Schuster
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.