Teams

LA - Victorious Secret

2023 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-04vs LA - MountainGate GatorsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Gaytan / Maisie Short vs Simone Friedman / Sachi Ford5-7, 4-6
2023-10-29vs LA - Downtown AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Gaytan / Erin Mand vs Claire Gibbs / Marion Bright3-6, 3-6
2023-10-01vs LA - Wise AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Rockwell / Cindy Gaytan vs Tanya Zarnitsa / Christine Benda6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Shih / Jennifer Demoff vs Julie Zhang / Lauren Giordano6-4, 6-1
2023-09-30vs LA-LLW-LATC-Lara FermanisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Dohrmann / Cindy Gaytan vs Lara Fermanis / Ilene Rosenzweig7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-24vs LA - Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Rockwell / Cindy Shih vs Andrea Kinloch / Tamara Treu6-7, 2-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Nicole Martino
published
3.37
Erin Mand
published 3.5
3.31
Maisie Short
published
3.21
Alexis Cittadine
published 3.5
3.21
Kate Jensen
published
3.15
Damla Dogan
published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Demoff
published
3.14
Cindy Gaytan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Linda Tyrer
published
3.08
Kathleen Dohrmann
published
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Susan Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
April Thrun
published 3
Julie Rockwell
published
Laura Smith Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Demoff + Linda Tyrer5352% games+4.5% vs expected
Cindy Gaytan + Kathleen Dohrmann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Erin Mand
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Maisie Short
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alexis Cittadine
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Kate Jensen
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Damla Dogan
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Demoff
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cindy Gaytan
67W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Linda Tyrer
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
Kathleen Dohrmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
April Thrun
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Julie Rockwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Smith Terry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.