Teams

Do, Jennifer

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-05-28vs Biddle, HeatherWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Carrie Eaton vs Kimberly Wooten / Carla Rushing1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Elizabeth Archer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNikki Elam / Bridgette Wheatley vs Meredith Boston / Angie Keyes6-4, 6-2
2025-04-30vs Harkey, RobinWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Elam / Leisa McCool vs Mallie Earl / September Moore6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Chandy Lee6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBridgette Wheatley / Amy Slade vs Clare Hanlon / Sandy Temple6-2, 6-1
2025-04-16vs Warren, EllenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Carrie Eaton vs Juli Johnson / Joey Sessums1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Jennifer Otto3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Sims / Jennifer Do vs Chiali Register / Alissa Joseph6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Steen, KrisWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Jennifer Do vs Lila Gibbs / Amy Murray6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Stephanie Sing6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Nikki Elam vs Kathy Rhodes / Bethany Szabo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBridgette Wheatley / Jennifer Johnson vs Emily Barnes / Deborah Norman2-6, 3-6
2025-04-02vs Collins, MindyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Do / Megan de Jong vs Martha Hill / Tara Baugh7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Amanda Camp6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNikki Elam / Bridgette Wheatley vs Jane Turner / Jamie McNamara7-6, 6-0
2025-03-28vs Davis, LaureeWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Do / Crystal Sims vs Lauree Davis / Mary Taylor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMegan de Jong vs Jordan Goodwin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Lauren Mashburn vs Cindi Beesley / Pshan Baine6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Stroud / Leisa McCool vs Vanessa Wilson / Melissa K Beach5-7, 2-6
2025-03-26vs Davis, LaureeLost 12
L#1 SinglesMegan de Jong vs Melissa K Beach2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeisa McCool / Lauren Mashburn vs Gretchen Ware / Angie DeLeon2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Do / Ashley Stroud vs Celia Coffey / Michele Rumbley6-1, 6-3
2025-03-05vs Harkey, RobinWon 31
W#1 DoublesMegan de Jong / Carrie Eaton vs Barbara Rushton / Mallie Earl6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Mashburn vs Kristen Harwell4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNikki Elam / Leisa McCool vs Amy Jacob / Chandy Lee6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Jackson / Bridgette Wheatley vs Clare Hanlon / Sallie Moseley6-1, 6-3
2025-02-26vs Steen, KrisWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Lauren Mashburn vs Kristin Steen / Jessica Langley6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Stroud vs Elizabeth Crisler6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Jackson / Leisa McCool vs Bethany Szabo / Kathy Rhodes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Do / Crystal Sims vs Deborah Norman / Anne Gibson6-1, 6-2
2025-02-16vs Collins, MindySplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Mashburn / Megan de Jong vs Karen de Kock / Amanda Camp6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNikki Elam vs Martha Hill6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCrystal Sims / Jennifer Do vs Mindy Collins / Haley Davis6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Jackson / Carrie Eaton vs Jane Turner / Julie Thompson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Warren, EllenLost 04
L#1 DoublesLeisa McCool / Nikki Elam vs Lara Martin / Alissa Joseph3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMegan de Jong vs Jessie Humble7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBridgette Wheatley / Ashley Stroud vs Jayme Griffin / Chiali Register3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Do / Crystal Sims vs Miao Zhao / Owen Mullen6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Leisa McCool
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Nikki Elam
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.78
Carrie Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.77
Megan de Jong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Bridgette Wheatley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Crystal Sims
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Ashley Stroud
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.57
Lauren Mashburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Eaton + Lauren Mashburn5553% games+7.0% vs expected
Nikki Elam + Leisa McCool12461% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leisa McCool
43W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Nikki Elam
25W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Carrie Eaton
34W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Megan de Jong
16W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bridgette Wheatley
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Crystal Sims
47W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ashley Stroud
39W–14L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Lauren Mashburn
41W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.