Teams

KLee (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03vs SHerndon (Weddington)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Jeannine Mortenson vs Jessica Parks / Courtney Warner4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKristi Lee / Mayela Magur vs Patricia Cosmo McCorkle / Victoria Sofarelli2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-19vs JCarney (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Wagner / Jane Moncayo vs January Crimin / Marisa Haehnlein0-6, 2-6
2022-04-18vs SChandler (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Jeannine Mortenson vs Katrina Richards / Diann Hickson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMayela Magur / Jodi VonEschen vs Laura Sullivan / Rona Karacaova7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-12vs MJessee/JBarton (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Katie Archer vs Jena Barton / Deepti Dua2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Monica Guerra6-1, 6-4
2022-03-29vs FHaselden (Palisades CC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Marjorie Wagner vs Lisa Strump / Nataliya Rubanenko1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Teri McConahie6-2, 6-0
2022-03-22vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Mayela Magur vs Julia Hartley / Jennifer Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKatie Archer / Mayela Magur vs Julie Sanniota / Melodie Ohaus6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Moncayo / Jeannine Mortenson vs Kate MacRone / Golin Kosowitz6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Mayela Magur
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Jane Moncayo
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.77
Laura Batten
published
2.69
Marjorie Wagner
published
2.54
Laura Seth
published
2.52
Lauren Baynham
published
2.45
Jodi VonEschen
published
Jeannine Mortenson
published
Kristi Lee
published
Melissa Leisure
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Moncayo + Mayela Magur8752% games+8.0% vs expected
Marjorie Wagner + Laura Seth3741% games−11.1% vs expected
Jeannine Mortenson + Laura Seth134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mayela Magur
133W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Jane Moncayo
49W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Laura Batten
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Marjorie Wagner
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
Laura Seth
9W–19L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lauren Baynham
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Jodi VonEschen
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jeannine Mortenson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Lee
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Leisure
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.