Teams

Ke.Hurter18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-13vs De.MacCormac18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebi Booker / Angela McGee vs Meredith Walter / Laura Wingo6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Erica Oliver vs Spencer Busby / Robin Rhaney1-6, 4-6
2024-05-06vs Te.Canterbury18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Enberg / Debi Booker vs Teran Canterbury / Stephanie Williams6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Au.Beam18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesNina Schweitzer / Brandy Vannoy vs Molly Lewis / Jolie LeBrun1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAngela McGee vs Shanie Kpanay6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-22vs La.Hampton18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Enberg / Kelly Hurter vs Darsan Russo / Susan Gentry6-4, 6-4
2024-04-15vs Br.Robinson18A2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela McGee / Erica Oliver vs Melissa Thomas / Marilyn Gordian4-6, 2-6
2024-04-01vs Cl.Duff18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs Claire Capps2-6, 1-6
2024-03-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Lalor / Angela McGee vs Mimi Potratz / Elizabeth Smith6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Erica Oliver vs Hutter Black / Elizabeth Jenkins6-2, 6-0
2024-03-11vs Sa.Fitzpatrick18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs Alice Touchette0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Enberg / Debi Booker vs Monika Garrell / Sarah Herring2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Anne Enberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Julia Hughes
published
2.69
Angela McGee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.59
Meagan Moore
published
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Nina Schweitzer
published
2.23
Debi Booker
published 2.5
2.05
Erica Mobley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela McGee + Kelly Hurter8260% games+9.6% vs expected
Kelly Hurter + Brandy Vannoy3246% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Hurter + Anne Enberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Enberg
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
Julia Hughes
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%9%91%
2.69
2.5
Kelly Hurter
53W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%21%79%
2.62
Meagan Moore
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
Erica Mobley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.