Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Manu Lohiya
published
3.56
Liangqi Gong
published
3.41
David Parekh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Bradford Meiseles
published 3.5
3.33
Payman Mohassel
published
3.31
Jeongsup Shim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Sashank Santhanam
published
3.25
Rohan Agarwal
published
3.21
Amit Sridharan
published 3.5
3.21
Matt Brunnings
published
3.20
Don Sung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jason Sampson
published
3.17
Mark Berlind
published
3.16
Jerry Scher
published
3.12
Bill Somers
published 3.5
3.03
Wenchao Zhou
published
2.77
Greg Xiong
published 3
Lakshmi Vengesanam
published
Russell Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Parekh + Bradford Meiseles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Manu Lohiya
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Liangqi Gong
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
David Parekh
50W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Bradford Meiseles
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Payman Mohassel
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Jeongsup Shim
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Sashank Santhanam
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Rohan Agarwal
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amit Sridharan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Matt Brunnings
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Don Sung
0W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Jason Sampson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Mark Berlind
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Jerry Scher
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Bill Somers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Wenchao Zhou
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Greg Xiong
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Lakshmi Vengesanam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Ford
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.