Teams

Half Baked

2026 SPR TRI-Level · Mid 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mid 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Amy Gravel
published 4.5
3.99
Meghan Denning Yuan
published
3.98
Kim Dever
published
3.93
Helen Filby
published 4
3.84
3.73
Imee Arocan
published 4
3.50
Katherine Baker
published
3.35
Yolanda Jackson
published
3.32
VERONICA FIELDS
published
3.30
Debi Stahl
published 3.5
Carol Brown
published 3.5
Kati Puhakainen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yolanda Jackson + VERONICA FIELDS14461% games+11.4% vs expected
Katherine Baker + Imee Arocan3345% games+2.5% vs expected
Katherine Baker + Helen Filby4254% games+1.3% vs expected
Christy Schreiber + Kim Dever3353% gamesnot enough data
Christy Schreiber + Katherine Baker3257% gamesnot enough data
Helen Filby + Imee Arocan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Gravel
10W–15L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Meghan Denning Yuan
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Kim Dever
94W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Helen Filby
135W–136L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Christy Schreiber
135W–131L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Imee Arocan
180W–121L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Katherine Baker
185W–119L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Yolanda Jackson
139W–104L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
VERONICA FIELDS
150W–113L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Debi Stahl
64W–107L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Brown
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kati Puhakainen
58W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.