Teams

Dagger 3.5W 18s Mon PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-06vs Phelps 3.5W 18s Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Lisa Cassidy vs Jill Phelps / Gayle Taylordean6-1, 6-3
2024-04-29vs Ustach 3.5W 18s Mon PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Amy Geer vs Betsy Hooper / Kelley Champion5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-08vs Pollina 3.5W 18s Mon PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesSusan Roach vs Leslie Sheppard2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-01vs Davis/Durham 3.5W 18+ Mon PMLost 01
L#2 SinglesSusan Roach vs Linda Hestenes1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-18vs Thomas 3.5W 18s Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Howard / Susan Roach vs Tiffany Weeks / Donna Esson6-2, 6-4
2024-03-04vs Hemric/ Messick 3.5W 18s Mon PMLost 01
L#2 SinglesSusan Roach vs Marie Dunn3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Susan Roach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.49
Kamron Moody
published
3.32
Jessica Huellmantel
published
3.18
Heidi Boswell
published
3.08
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Janet Howard
published
3.03
Amy Geer
published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Cassidy
published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
2.92
Ashton Choros
published 3
2.85
Ariel Holtzman
published 3
2.84
Michelle Swinyer
published
Karen Hartley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Dagger + Amy Geer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Roach
121W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
Kamron Moody
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jessica Huellmantel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Heidi Boswell
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Janet Howard
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Geer
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Lisa Cassidy
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Ashton Choros
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Ariel Holtzman
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Michelle Swinyer
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Karen Hartley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.