Teams

MMetzl (Sardis)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-06vs STrivanovic/MJessee (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Holly Foley vs Monica Guerra / Shikha Agrawal5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBardeen Forman / Donna Pollack vs Jena Barton / Paulina Coello4-6, 5-7
2023-05-02vs JCrimin (BCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Deborah Spaugh vs Michelle Lynch / Rachel Miller3-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs HLee (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Jay / Deborah Spaugh vs Allyson McDonough / Dawn Tenev1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Harris / Holly Foley vs Hilary Lee / Stephanie Rock0-6, 3-6
2023-04-04vs JCarney (PPRSC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesClaudia Prager / Holly Foley vs Nanci Weil / Mindy Zimmerman6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCathie DeCramer / Donna Pollack vs Amy Wray / Meredith BROUSE3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-03-28vs TCooper/TAmos (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Deborah Spaugh vs Jamie Zarambo / Victoria Sofarelli6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-21vs SHerndon (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Katherine Currier vs Phyllis Waud / Gabriela ROY0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Jennifer Zarins vs Jacqui Gentile / Stacey Herndon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Pollack / Carron Flinter vs Susan Staley / Jurga Petrikis1-6, 4-6
2023-03-14vs KLee (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Claudia Prager vs Katie Archer / Lauren Olson6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Laura Batten6-3, 6-3
2023-03-07vs JCrimin (BCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCathie DeCramer / Deborah Spaugh vs Susan Blackman / Holly Disser0-6, 0-6
2023-02-28vs STrivanovic/MJessee (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Prager / Holly Foley vs Jena Barton / Jayna Halliday6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Shikha Agrawal7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Carron Flinter vs Gianna Elden / Julie Sallee2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Martha Metzl
published 3.5
Anne Wilson
published 3.5
2.97
Holly Foley
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.93
Deborah Spaugh
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.84
Ruth Harris
published
2.84
Bardeen Forman
published 3
2.82
Cathie DeCramer
published 3
2.80
Katherine Currier
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Claudia Prager
published 3
2.54
Carron Flinter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Donna Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Hartzog
published
Jennifer Zarins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Foley + Deborah Spaugh161052% games−0.2% vs expected
Donna Pollack + Bardeen Forman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Martha Metzl
152W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Anne Wilson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Holly Foley
77W–79L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Deborah Spaugh
47W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ruth Harris
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Bardeen Forman
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cathie DeCramer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Katherine Currier
32W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Claudia Prager
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carron Flinter
20W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
2.5
Donna Pollack
21W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%64%36%
2.45
Elizabeth Hartzog
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Zarins
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.