Teams

BTC:Fun Fall Females:Wimble

2024 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-07vs ESB:Miss Hits:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudith Wimble / Rebecca Stevens vs Deborah Shaw / Laura Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-20vs TRS:Stowe with the Flow:SchulzWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Bisset / Jennifer Rowling vs Willa Foran / Pamela Clapp6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-05vs ESB:Eclipses:Samter/NeuertLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Rowling / Kristin Walsh vs Natalie Neuert / Nancy Kaplan1-6, 5-7
2024-09-29vs ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans/BlackmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna Bisset / Judith Wimble vs Jeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans4-6, 1-6
2024-09-22vs EE:FonsecaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudith Wimble / Rebecca Stevens vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Lynn Bursell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-21vs OC:Our Court Jesters:DurstinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Walsh / Megan Shrestha vs Lisa Durstin / Amy Dexter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-15vs EE:Doran/DeAngelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna Bisset / Megan Shrestha vs Molly Doran / Caitlin DeAngelis3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Miss Hits:Strausser7070141
2ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans/Blackmore6161239
3EE:Doran/DeAngelis4343659
4TRS:Stowe with the Flow:Schulz3434861
5OC:Our Court Jesters:Durstin34341075
6ESB:Eclipses:Samter/Neuert25251178
7BTC:Fun Fall Females:Wimble25251274
8EE:Fonseca16161271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Judith Wimble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jennifer Rowling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jenna Bisset
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Shrestha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Bisset + Jennifer Rowling213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Wimble
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jennifer Rowling
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
Jenna Bisset
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristin Walsh
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Shrestha
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Stevens
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.