Teams

HEDS

2022 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-30vs Chew Gum & Kick AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Clemens / Lauren Reichman vs Brad Mullet / Mary Voelmle4-6, 2-4
2022-05-25vs BHSCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Clemens / Lauren Reichman vs Daniel Carlson / Joan Carlson7-6, 6-2
2022-05-15vs Hops and DropsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Reichman / David Clemens vs Qian Cai / Jordan Barr3-6, 4-6
2022-05-13vs BHSCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Schmidt / Lauren Reichman vs Tammy Schwab / Steve Lichtenstein3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / CAROLYN WARD vs Lindsay Phillips / Reid Phillips6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-24vs Hops and DropsLost 01
L#3 DoublesRene Roy / Beth McCarthy vs Jordan Barr / Stacy Moren2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-10vs Chew Gum & Kick AceSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaul Schmidt / Lauren Reichman vs Brad Mullet / Corinne Haywood1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBeth McCarthy / Rene Roy vs Dulcy Giuliano / Derek Frazier6-2, 6-4
2022-04-03vs Hops and DropsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Reichman / Matthew Rosendale vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Michael Cline6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-27vs BHSCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLauren Reichman / Paul Schmidt vs Jennie Chiu / Matthew Reidenbach1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBeth McCarthy / Rene Roy vs Joan Carlson / Daniel Carlson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Lauren Reichman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
CAROLYN WARD
published 4
3.76
Brett Burk
published 4
David Clemens
published 4
3.55
Rene Roy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.25
Allison Ewing
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Ewing + Brett Burk213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Reichman
60W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
CAROLYN WARD
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Brett Burk
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
David Clemens
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Allison Ewing
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.