Teams

5 Burkwood Matthews

2023 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-24vs 3 Westwood Racelis Double TroubleLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelissa Allen / Lindsey O'Kane vs Donna Bearman / Michelle Baker5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Hughes / Virginia Bowie vs Laura Strickler / Rose Yuen5-7, 4-6
2023-08-10vs 2 Dominion WagnerWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Stewart / Virginia Bowie vs Deb Eldridge / Sheri Carlyle6-3, 6-4
2023-08-03vs 7 CCV BennettLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hughes / Melissa Allen vs Kristin Mullins / Kerry DeLacey4-6, 6-7
2023-07-20vs 3 Westwood Racelis Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsey O'Kane / Melissa Allen vs Katie Gerecke / Jill Prince6-2, 7-5
2023-07-17vs 8 Hermitage Lines LadiesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsey O'Kane / Melissa Allen vs Sally Caldwell / Sarah Martin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Melissa Stewart vs Lynne Butz / Beth Stinson6-3, 6-1
2023-07-06vs 6 CCV Butler/ReifsniderLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hughes / Melissa Allen vs Anne Henry / Ashley Millen2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.06
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.75
Theresa Hughes
published
3.75
Kathy Denunzio
published 4
3.28
Melissa Allen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Virginia Bowie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
April Buckles
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Mourtzakis
published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Garrett
published
3.01
Diana Gary
published 3.5
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Kathy Denunzio5152% gamesnot enough data
Donna Mourtzakis + Virginia Bowie213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Allen + Kathy Denunzio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.34
Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.06
Theresa Hughes
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Kathy Denunzio
125W–93L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Melissa Allen
116W–116L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
April Buckles
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Garrett
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.04
3.5
Diana Gary
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.