Teams

SDNC 3.5 RSFTC (3:2)/ Reicher

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-16vs SDNC 3.5 FRCC (3:2)/ FederhartWon 10
W#1 SinglesTodd Bulich vs Vishal Verma4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-02vs SDNC LLW 3.5M Rangers-KCP/ WarrenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTodd Bulich vs Matthew Brush0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChristopher Villasenor vs Curran van Waarde6-3, 6-2
2024-05-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesChristopher Villasenor vs Arch Peregoff6-0, 6-1
2024-05-19vs SDNC 3.5 Santaluz (2:3)/ BahaWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Villasenor vs Francisco Flores6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Schiffman / Christopher Villasenor vs Eric Berryman / Todd Walker7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-05vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3:2)/ SchneiderSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTodd Bulich / Vivek Jain vs Vikram Boregowda / Vijay Venkatesh6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesEmmanuel de Seroux vs Naresh Bhavaraju2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesBrian Hays / Christopher Villasenor vs John Brick / Mark Noet6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmmanuel de Seroux vs MICHAEL GONZALEZ6-3, 6-1
2024-04-21vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3:2)/ PatwardhanLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Villasenor / Gustav Moltke vs Deepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-14vs SDNC 3.5 La Costa (3:2)/ ZenderWon 10
W#2 DoublesStanford Yee / Christopher Villasenor vs Nicholas Esayian / Robert Laplante6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Wayne Chan
published
3.50
Christopher Villasenor
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.45
Todd Bulich
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Stanford Yee
published 3.5
3.26
Alfonso Tumini
published 3.5
Daniel Morilak
published 3.5
3.15
Brian Hays
published 3.5
2.96
Emmanuel de Seroux
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Gilbert Vasquez
published
Murray Reicher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stanford Yee + Christopher Villasenor8257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wayne Chan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Christopher Villasenor
46W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Todd Bulich
48W–63L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Stanford Yee
52W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Alfonso Tumini
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Daniel Morilak
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brian Hays
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Emmanuel de Seroux
42W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Gilbert Vasquez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Murray Reicher
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.