Teams

AN 6.5W 18 & Over (Sims)

2025 Ann · Gadsden

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRuth Downey / Allie Goggans vs Drue Taylor / Angela Weissgerber0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Allison York
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Carolyne Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.44
Allie Goggans
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Hayley Loeken
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jean Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lacy Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Morgan Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
RACHEL BARNETT
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Sims
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Ruth Downey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison York + Rebecca Sims7067% gamesnot enough data
Lacy Jackson + Rebecca Sims404 matchesnot enough data
Jean Ellison + Allison York303 matchesnot enough data
Allie Goggans + Rebecca Sims123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison York
17W–3L career · 12 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Carolyne Marsh
9W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Allie Goggans
5W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Hayley Loeken
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Ellison
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacy Jackson
10W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Gibson
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
RACHEL BARNETT
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Sims
16W–5L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Downey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.