Teams

Lady Strikers Tri

2026 Anne Arundel Tri-Level · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.41 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Party at the NetLost 12
L#1 DoublesTia Briscoe / Casey Royster vs Martha Nolan / Ellen McLaughlin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Mackowiak / Kellie Gough McLendon vs Nicole Geis / Mary Arnold6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGina Telegadas / Francesca Dougherty vs Lori Trull / Shawna Laurendine3-6, 2-6
2026-08-15vs BaldwinWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Astle / Krista Swetz vs Lisa Mulholland / Kelsey Forbes2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCasey Royster / Kimberly Walko vs Leann Gibbs / Nicole Gownley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBridget Kelly / Heather Nesti vs Jennifer Baldwin / Ann Harrison6-3, 6-3
2026-08-09vs WalshLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Aklil Getachew vs Amy LaMoure / Jennifer Coady3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Walko / Mary Li vs Dale Clark / Elizabeth Jacobson0-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs Party at the NetLost 12
L#1 DoublesLesli Thompson / Jennifer Astle vs Elizabeth Forgione / Ellen McLaughlin1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Garritano / Ashley Yuscavage vs Belinda McLean / Mary Arnold6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHeather Nesti / Emily Trochimowicz vs Lori Trull / Shawna Laurendine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lady Strikers Tri0224860

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
PAULA SMITH
published
3.69
Tynika Wilson
published
3.64
Stephanie Mackowiak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tia Briscoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Ay Rothany Koballa
published 3.5
3.45
Kellie Gough McLendon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Lesli Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Krista Swetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Casey Royster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Mary Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jennifer Astle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Roshni Fifadra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Aklil Getachew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ashley Yuscavage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Samantha Garritano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Heather Nesti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.13
Kimberly Walko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Paige Wagner
published
2.96
Gina Telegadas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Emily Trochimowicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Bridget Kelly
published 3
2.75
Francesca Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roshni Fifadra + Samantha Garritano7363% games+7.0% vs expected
Ashley Yuscavage + Samantha Garritano4353% games+4.1% vs expected
Casey Royster + Ashley Yuscavage6451% games+2.2% vs expected
PAULA SMITH + Tynika Wilson201850% games+1.7% vs expected
Aklil Getachew + Roshni Fifadra4846% games−0.3% vs expected
Tia Briscoe + Casey Royster4549% games−6.5% vs expected
Aklil Getachew + Lesli Thompson5647% gamesnot enough data
Francesca Dougherty + Gina Telegadas4550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Tynika Wilson
22W–23L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Mackowiak
72W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Tia Briscoe
285W–132L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ay Rothany Koballa
130W–122L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Kellie Gough McLendon
42W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Lesli Thompson
155W–121L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Krista Swetz
41W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Mary Li
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Jennifer Astle
126W–131L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aklil Getachew
115W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ashley Yuscavage
108W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Samantha Garritano
58W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Heather Nesti
179W–165L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Kimberly Walko
160W–161L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Paige Wagner
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Gina Telegadas
39W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Emily Trochimowicz
103W–112L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Bridget Kelly
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Francesca Dougherty
57W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.