Teams

MCKIM 40+

2025 Combo Doubles 40&Over-NC · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-07vs Anderson-NC-SouthavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Wingo / Stephanie White vs Tracy Hill / Samantha Phillips6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLacey Dunlap / Kimberly Tarsi vs Shelia Anderson / Vanessa Washington3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLoretta McKim / Martha Hall vs Yongqin Zhang / Kim Yount2-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs Anderson-NC-SouthavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesLacey Dunlap / Lisa Wingo vs Shelia Anderson / Vanessa Washington6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie White / WENDY Vines vs Demetrius Boyland / Samantha Phillips4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Potter / Susan Patrone vs Tracy Hill / Yongqin Zhang2-6, 1-6
2025-09-02vs Anderson-NC-SouthavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesWENDY Vines / Stephanie White vs Samantha Phillips / Tracy Hill6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJamie Frank / Loretta McKim vs Yongqin Zhang / Shelia Anderson3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKimberly Tarsi / Martha Hall vs Vanessa Washington / Dorian Abston6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Brandi Tomlinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Lacey Dunlap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Michelle McKim
published
2.45
Loretta McKim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
WENDY Vines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Ruth Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Jamie Frank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.36
Lisa Wingo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Kimberly Tarsi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Martha Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loretta McKim + Lisa Wingo6650% games−1.7% vs expected
Jamie Frank + Lacey Dunlap123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandi Tomlinson
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Lacey Dunlap
26W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
Michelle McKim
15W–26L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Loretta McKim
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
WENDY Vines
29W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Ruth Potter
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Jamie Frank
13W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Lisa Wingo
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Kimberly Tarsi
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Martha Hall
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.