Teams

MSIL 7.5 Fall Combo Mixed Risinger-Springfield

2025 Fall Combo Mixed · MSIL Fall Combo Mixed 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesNatalie Brown / Joshua Risinger vs Teri Scaggs / Angad Mehta1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJayda Williams / Noah Williams vs Kyo Nakanishi / Brett Scroggins3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Ehrlich / Chris Ehrlich vs Minsun Kim / Chris Sarol3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNoah Williams / Kortnie Lovell vs Gaston Suardiaz / Susan Novitsky6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Brown / Joshua Risinger vs Natalie Malinowski / Adam Huls4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmber Ehrlich / Chris Ehrlich vs Maria Miguens / Mark Gernand6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesNoah Williams / Isabella Griffiths vs Andrew Leakey / Lisa Ainsworth6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ehrlich / Amber Ehrlich vs Chris Sarol / Minsun Kim6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJASON DARCY PINOTE / Michelle Pulce-Flynn vs Lijian Zhang / Sarah Kim3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAmber Ehrlich / Joshua Risinger vs Sean Miller / Cara Boester6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Brown / Connor Mcandrew vs Brett Henneberg / Paige McNamara7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Ehrlich / Jayda Williams vs Cymbria Jung / John Delanois2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAmber Ehrlich / William Ehrlich vs Aaron Rapp / Meredith King6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJASON DARCY PINOTE / Zariah Wherry vs Sean Miller / Michele Kendall7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBradley Douglas / Kortnie Lovell vs Ashley Dallapiazza / Brett Henneberg3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSengla Boualavong / Zariah Wherry vs Maria Miguens / Rongqing Han2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Ehrlich / Chris Ehrlich vs Gaston Suardiaz / Susan Novitsky6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNatalie Brown / William Ehrlich vs Natalie Malinowski / Mark Gernand6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MSIL Fall Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amber Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bradley Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
William Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Chris Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Joshua Risinger
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Kristen Burkard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Michelle Pulce-Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Connor Mcandrew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Isabella Griffiths
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
JASON DARCY PINOTE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jayda Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jon Borden
published
Kortnie Lovell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Boualavong
published
Natalie Brown
published
Noah Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sengla Boualavong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Zariah Wherry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sengla Boualavong + Laura Boualavong14263% gamesnot enough data
Amber Ehrlich + Chris Ehrlich6452% gamesnot enough data
Amber Ehrlich + William Ehrlich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Ehrlich
12W–14L career · type M · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bradley Douglas
8W–13L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Ehrlich
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Chris Ehrlich
26W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Joshua Risinger
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Kristen Burkard
56W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Michelle Pulce-Flynn
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Connor Mcandrew
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Isabella Griffiths
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
JASON DARCY PINOTE
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jayda Williams
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Borden
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kortnie Lovell
34W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Boualavong
87W–55L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Brown
12W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Noah Williams
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sengla Boualavong
53W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zariah Wherry
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.