Teams

Je.Solomon40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-01vs Ki.Roberts40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Sykes / Marilyn Gordian vs Jane Snyder / Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Wieber / Kristen Deak vs Kristen Gillispie / Michele Chambers6-4, 6-0
2025-09-28vs Ki.Manning40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian vs Anne Redmond / Miriam Waters6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Earle / Michele Gan vs Stephanie Fogarty / Lanier McRee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-24vs Pa.Spell40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Earle / Carolyn Wieber vs Pamela Spell / Carol Abercrombie3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-03vs Be.Farrell40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian vs Stephanie Bradley / Kelly Thompson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Earle / Carolyn Wieber vs Jana Inman / Beth Farrell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Pa.Spell40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian vs Kimberlei Gill / Carol Abercrombie4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Earle / Corinne Alavi vs Michele Lee / Cathy Lanter6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-20vs La.Yopp40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Earle / Beth Shelly vs Francie LaRue / Natalie Brincefield7-5, 7-6
2025-08-13vs Ki.Roberts40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesCorinne Alavi / Lori Sykes vs Jane Snyder / Julia Hash7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Michele Nowicki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Marilyn Gordian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Dana Earle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
2.55
Lori Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lea Edmondson
published
2.39
Carolyn Wieber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Corinne Alavi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Mindy Hamlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Nowicki + Marilyn Gordian311654% games−1.3% vs expected
Carolyn Wieber + Dana Earle131546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michele Nowicki
88W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Marilyn Gordian
80W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Dana Earle
62W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Jennifer Sagal Solomon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Lori Sykes
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Lea Edmondson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.50
2.5
Carolyn Wieber
84W–108L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Corinne Alavi
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Mindy Hamlin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.