Teams

3-WLillard-HR

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-30vs 2-SHanda-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Lillard / David Sloan vs James Orleans / Roberto Gomperts3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-16vs 2-SHanda-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Irby / William Lillard vs Jeffrey Kopf / Roberto Gomperts6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-09vs 1-ELindblom-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesTom Irby / William Lillard vs Mark Stone / Philip Sweigart6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBart Cleary / Chris Stewart vs Greg Samsa / Nicky Walker6-0, 6-2
2022-04-02vs 1-ELindblom-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Irby / William Lillard vs Phil Korest / Philip Sweigart6-2, 6-1
2022-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Lillard / Chris Stewart vs Howard Fitts / Gilbert Leggett6-4, 6-4
2022-03-15vs 1-ELindblom-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Lillard / Tom Irby vs Eric Lindblom / Philip Sweigart6-4, 6-1
2022-03-05vs 4-DJordan-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesBart Cleary / William Lillard vs Destry Jordan / Alan Billings3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Greg Matera
published 4
3.53
William Lillard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.53
Michael Spears
published
3.45
Bart Cleary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Niall Buckley
published
3.33
Jeffrey Qualls
published
3.22
Arthur Lawida
published 3.5
3.10
Chris Sansone
published 3.5
Michael Shachtman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Sansone + Niall Buckley3257% gamesnot enough data
Michael Spears + Niall Buckley123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Spears + William Lillard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Matera
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
William Lillard
51W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Michael Spears
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Bart Cleary
13W–29L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
Niall Buckley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jeffrey Qualls
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Arthur Lawida
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Chris Sansone
11W–27L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Michael Shachtman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.