Teams

CACM GREEN

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-04-25vs GTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesHalley MacKiernan / Thomas Mitchell vs Caitlin Finn / Seth Brislin6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Springer / Colin Day vs Teresa Crane / Thomas Cafmeyer4-6, 1-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Daniel / Steven Graves vs Rachael Scheper / Jose Amador0-6, 0-6
2021-04-18vs NJ BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Graves / Wendy Daniel vs Keaton Howe / Jordan Soldano1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNate Moeller / Erin Hirstine vs Trevor Updegraff / Lisa Tran6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Mitchell / Sam Springer vs James Mejia / Jordan Campbell2-6, 5-7
2021-04-11vs MC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Mitchell / Halley MacKiernan vs Dennis Dozon / Brittney Ricci6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesColin Day / Sam Springer vs Daniel Lizarribar / Tanya Taylor6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErin Hirstine / Nate Moeller vs Alex Le / Denise Belk3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-04vs GTC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesHalley MacKiernan / Thomas Mitchell vs Jeff Crosley / Deborah Weis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColin Day / Sam Springer vs Juana Donald / Ronald Ramirez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNate Moeller / Erin Hirstine vs Claire Douthit / Oliver McKinstry6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Amy Springer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Colin Day
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Hirstine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Halley MacKiernan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nate Moeller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sam Springer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Steven Graves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Springer + Nate Moeller5252% gamesnot enough data
Erin Hirstine + Nate Moeller213 matchesnot enough data
Colin Day + Amy Springer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Springer
30W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Colin Day
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Erin Hirstine
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Halley MacKiernan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nate Moeller
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sam Springer
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steven Graves
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.