Teams

SD La Jolla Beach and Tennis/ Lucia

2023 Adult 40 & Over Capstone League · Capstone Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.70 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs SD University City RC/ KellieLost 01
L#3 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Allison Sterett vs Jodi Doolittle / Rainy Miller6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-02-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rens / Millie Yablonicky vs Aurelie Udall / Julie Anna Gerken7-6, 6-1
2023-02-11vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnna Palmer / Allison Sterett vs Brenda Barnett / Susan Lagasse2-6, 2-6
2023-02-07vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieWon 20
W#1 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Colleen Royal vs Beth Sauer / Jennifer Anderson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Allison Sterett vs Kristie Alva / Brianna Sullivan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-31vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Royal / Millie Yablonicky vs Brianna Sullivan / Christine Lee6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Sterett / Jacqueline Rich vs Lisa Crisafulli / Beth Sauer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-01-24vs SD University City RC/ KellieSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rens / Millie Yablonicky vs Aurelie Udall / Rainy Miller1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesUna Davis / Tiffany Kellogg vs Julie Anna Gerken / Karyn McCartney2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Capstone Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Millie Yablonicky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.83
Colleen Royal
published 5
4.54
Jacqueline Rich
published
4.42
Allison Sterett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Anna Palmer
published 4.5
Jennifer Rens
published
Lucia Romanov
published
Una Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kellogg + Allison Sterett241056% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Millie Yablonicky
71W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
5.04
5
Colleen Royal
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.83
Jacqueline Rich
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
4.54
4.5
Allison Sterett
123W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Anna Palmer
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
Jennifer Rens
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucia Romanov
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Una Davis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.