Teams

KY/LEX/Landon

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-06vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesQingru Xu / Cassandra Ginn vs Meghan Whitlow / Sarah Watts6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Laura Moffett3-6, 3-6
2025-11-21vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Kristin Harrison vs Elizabeth Yanik / Laura Moffett6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Amanda Fredericks6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Cassandra Ginn vs Sarah Watts / Meghan Whitlow6-1, 6-1
2025-11-16vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Harrison / Anna Marino vs Sarah Watts / Amanda Fredericks6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Allyson Foster6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCassandra Ginn / Charlotte Nickerson vs Laura Moffett / Lindsey Burchett7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-07vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Moreman / Kristin Harrison vs Allyson Foster / Elizabeth Yanik6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Laura Moffett3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesQingru Xu / Cassandra Ginn vs Sarah Watts / Meghan Whitlow6-1, 6-0
2025-10-28vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Hume vs Amanda Fredericks6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCassandra Ginn / Anna Marino vs Ann-michael Rawlings / Lindsey Burchett4-6, 5-7
2025-10-12vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 20
W#1 DoublesQingru Xu / Mary Mason Boaz vs Lindsey Burchett / Laura Moffett6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Tina Smith vs Elizabeth Yanik / Sarah Watts7-5, 6-1
2025-10-07vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon vs Elizabeth Yanik / Lindsey Burchett6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDana Hume vs Ann-michael Rawlings6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Smith / Charlotte Nickerson vs Allyson Foster / Sarah Watts6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Dana Hume
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Qingru Xu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Katie Landon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Allison Moreman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.52
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.29
Niki Moss
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.26
Anna Marino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.24
Charlotte Nickerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.24
Cassandra Ginn
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Mary Mason Boaz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Moss + Anna Marino3253% gamesnot enough data
Brittni Fain-Marnitz + Katie Landon303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Moreman + Katie Landon123 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Nickerson + Katie Landon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Hume
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Qingru Xu
20W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Katie Landon
18W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Allison Moreman
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52
Niki Moss
14W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Anna Marino
20W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
3
Charlotte Nickerson
12W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
3
Cassandra Ginn
3W–10L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
Mary Mason Boaz
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina Smith
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.